[Carrie Spinks]

Hi Carolyn,

There are examples of an aged care IPC program on the ACIPC Tools and Template webpage: https://www.acipc.org.au/aged-care/aged-care-ipc-templates-and-tools/

See: Aged Care IPC Program and Plans – there are a lot of examples and tools donated by amazing people and organisations.

The aged care space is a one stop shop for so many things, so please pop on and use use all the resources: https://www.acipc.org.au/aged-care/

Regards Carrie

[Carrie Spinks]

Thanks Camilla

Great question.

A lot of aged care organisations brought in this product/method during the pandemic – due to the product safety, 100% biodegradable – safe around people (can be used while in the room)  (Note: this differs to other products often used in fogging/misting) and on the environment, as well as ARTG registered to varied organisms.

Nanocyn Disinfectant & Sanitiser – Disinfectant, hospital grade (292455)- https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/artg/292455

Note applications vary – spray, fogging, misting. Most applications in aged care facilities used misting.

IPC and cleaning guidelines state the need for a 2 step (neutral detergent clean, followed by a disinfectant clean) or 2:1 (combine neutral detergent and disinfectant product) clean for the management of risk, infection and outbreak.

Guideline Australian Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Infection in Healthcare: 3.1.3 Routine management of the physical environment-pg. 56 – Use of disinfectants –  https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-05/australian-guidelines-for-the-prevention-and-control-of-infection-in-healthcare.pdf

The Aged Care Infection Prevention and Control Guide – Chapter 6: Clean, safe and hygienic environments – pg. 106 – The process of disinfection
https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/attachments/The-Aged-Care-Infection-Prevention-and-Control-Guide.pdf

Environmental cleaning:
information for cleaners – https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/attachments/environmental_cleaning_information_for_cleaners_fact_sheet.pdf

Environmental cleaning:
emerging environmental cleaning
technologies – addresses misting/fogging – 
https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/attachments/environmental_cleaning_emerging_environmental_cleaning_tech_fact_sheet.pdf

Nanosyn is a chemical disinfectant product, hence manual cleaning is required with a neutral detergent prior to its use, to ensure a 2 step clean. 

Therefore , if a pre clean is not being attended and disinfectant is being applied on unclean environments (surfaces/items), this practice is non compliant with guidelines. If cleaning is being carried out prior to disinfectant application, it meets requirements of a 2 step process.

Management may be interested in considerations to costing – two step cleaning process, compared to a 2:1 step cleaning process. Consider products, misting machine purchase/maintenance and labour costs.

Hope that helps

Regards Carrie

• This reply was modified 3 weeks, 1 day ago by Carrie Spinks.
• This reply was modified 3 weeks ago by Carrie Spinks.

[Carrie Spinks]

Hi Diane,

Great question.

Back in the pandemic I did do a small facility based trial with a transparent masks. We did not end up purchasing.

I am sure design/manufacturing qualities has improved since then.

Could I suggest working with the supplier/manufacturer to obtain a supply and undertake a small study yourselves. Consider: compliance to N95/P2 requirements, HCW comfort, ease for others to lip read, durability. Generally staff and residents are happy to provide feedback Its a great continuous improvement project.

All the best

Carrie

[Carrie Spinks]

Good afternoon,

To assist with this use the Care Delivery Evidence Collection Tool (CDECT) resources which have been updated and published by the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission recently.

Link: https://www.acipc.org.au/cdect-resources-updated-by-commission/

The changes have been provided in a post prev titled: CDECT documents and IPC related review

Link: https://www.acipc.org.au/members/forums-members/topic/cdect-documents-and-ipc-related-review/

Regards Carrie

• This reply was modified 1 month, 2 weeks ago by Carrie Spinks.
• This reply was modified 1 month, 2 weeks ago by Carrie Spinks.

[Carrie Spinks]

Hi Luis,

Also wanted to present this resource:

Could it be Sepsis – Sepsis Australia – https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/resources/could-it-be-sepsis-easy-read

Regards Carrie

[Carrie Spinks]

Hi Liza,

Guidance does not specifically ban linen chutes in healthcare facilities; however, national IPC principles require healthcare organisations to minimise the dispersal of microorganisms during linen handling, contain contaminated linen at the point of use, and prevent environmental contamination. These principles are reflected in the Australian Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Infection in Healthcare, Laundry Practice Standards, Australasian Health Facility Guidelines and NSW jurisdictional guidance documents, which emphasise minimal agitation of soiled linen and prevention of aerosol contamination. Consequently, traditional gravity-fed linen chute systems are frequently considered inconsistent with contemporary IPC risk-reduction strategies in healthcare environments, particularly acute care settings.
References:
• Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. (2019). Australian guidelines for the prevention and control of infection in healthcare. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/resources/australian-guidelines-prevention-and-control-infection-healthcare
• Australasian Health Infrastructure Alliance. (2025). Australasian Health Facility Guidelines: Part D – Infection prevention and control. https://healthfacilityguidelines.com.au/
• Clinical Excellence Commission. (2024). Infection prevention and control precautions. NSW Health. https://www.cec.health.nsw.gov.au/keep-patients-safe/infection-prevention-and-control/infection-prevention-and-control-precautions
• Standards Australia. (2024). AS 4146:2024 Laundry practice. Standards Australia.

Hope that helps

Regards Carrie

[Carrie Spinks]

This is a fantasitc initiative Luis

This article may assist with your journey: Sepsis in Older Adults in Long-Term Care Facilities: Challenges
in Diagnosis and Management: https://files.commons.gc.cuny.edu/wp-content/blogs.dir/5363/files/2020/11/Sepsis-in-Older-Adults-in-Long-Term-Care-Facilities-Challengesin-Diagnosis-and-Management.pdf

Regards Carrie

[Carrie Spinks]

Hi Liza

Under the Australia New Zealand Food Standards – Standard 3.2.2

Broken plates, bowls, cups, mugs -Dispose into a designated rigid broken crockery/glass container or heavy-duty general waste bin
Broken glassware-Dispose into a labelled broken glass container or sharps-style rigid container
Damaged knives or blades-Remove from service and place into approved sharps or rigid metal disposal container

Reference: Food Standards Australia New Zealand: https://www.foodstandards.gov.au/business/food-safety-standards?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Biological sharps container is not generally used for broken kitchen items. However, if there is contamination with blood or body fluids on the broken item, a biological sharps container can be used – within capacity. For example; where there has been an injury and there is blood on a broken knife blade- this can be risk assessed as biological waste and disposed in sharps bin.

Hope that helps

Regards Carrie

[Carrie Spinks]

Hi Liza,

All SPC practices should be provided in a management procedure/policy. The procedure needs to reflect current best practice/guidelines.
HCW should refer to the procedure to ensure their practice is correct and inline with the organisations wants.

Hope that helps

Regards Carrie

[Carrie Spinks]

Hi Narelle,

To my understanding:

In Australia, aged care homes are required to monitor antimicrobial use and effects primarily to ensure clinical safety and reduce antimicrobial resistance, rather than specifically to monitor the direct financial cost of the drugs. However, monitoring for appropriate use and adverse events inherently involves looking at the financial cost-effectiveness of antimicrobials (in this case antibiotics), as inappropriate use is considered a waste of resources.

Direct Medication Costs: Cost of expensive, broad-spectrum antibiotics compared to more appropriate, targeted, and generally cheaper agents.

Hence, reviewing the cost of all antibiotics against the cost of those that were prescribed inappropriately – will provide the cost of wasted resources. If high, this will highlight the need for change to ensure clinical safety.

e.g.
AB costs total= $3000
AB inappropriate agent or prescribed costs = $2000

3000-2000 = 1000

If correct prescribing had occurred the cost of AB should have been $1000
$2000 is high demonstrating high wasted resource use and high inappropriate prescribing.

Laboratory/Diagnostic Costs: Identifying costs associated with unnecessary pathology tests or prolonged investigation can also be reviewed.

Regards Carrie

[Carrie Spinks]

Thank you Anitha,

There are JD examples for IPC leads on the ACIPC website – these can be adjusted to suit the home or organisation.
See IPC lead role – Link:https://www.acipc.org.au/aged-care/aged-care-ipc-templates-and-tools/

Hopfully there may be something to assist with aged care coordinators role in NZ.

Regards Carrie

[Carrie Spinks]

Hi Liza,

Unfortunately at times sharps (needles, razors, ampules etc) are found in soiled laundry. The sharps bin in the laundry  enables at the point, safe disposal – rather than transport to a sharps container else where.

All sharps container requirements would need to be upheld – i.e. height, fixed, plastic material compliant, filling line, container close and removal.

Regards Carrie

[Carrie Spinks]

Hi Leonor,

The Australian Guidelines are written from evidence based practice.

The guideline links and pg number are placed in the above post and the reference numbers included in the information cut – for you to review.

Kind regards Carrie

[Carrie Spinks]

Hi Sana,

I can only speak from previous roles and care environments.

Certainly surveillance was taken on wound infection types – looking for trends, practices that may cause trends and changes to practice to minimise infections – then re audit.

Results were raised at MAC and IPC/Governance meetings

Supply and storage of wound care products was audited 1/4ly

RN/EN received onsite/omline wound care/AT education and undertook annual competencies – as appropriate. Records of attendance and competencies maintained.

The facilities had several trolleys – 1-2 per wing – these were required to be cleaned pre and post use – no supplies left on the trolleys and there was no draws

The final question is to large to answer in a post.

Hope this helps a little

Regards Carrie

[Carrie Spinks]

Hi Liza,

This is certainly a converstaion to be had with pharmacist and GP. Consider raising this in a MAC meeting for the overall management of a resident with recurring UTI.

Consider using the UTI resources to guide practice: To Dip or Not to Dip User Guide to the Clinical Pathway
for older people in aged care homes: https://www.agedcarequality.gov.au/sites/default/files/media/guide-clinical-pathway-aged-care-homes-suspected-utis.pdf

Regards Carrie

[Author]

Posts