Course Access
Hi All,
Some considerations around this matter:
Providers are well placed to have a HR procedure for mask exemption, including different scenarios.
There are no current Public Health Directions in effect requiring someone to wear a face mask.
However, during periods where there is high circulation of a respiratory organism, (demonstrated by increased case numbers and outbreaks in an area/region), as well as a vulnerable population (older person and RACF), care providers may risk assess the situation to require their staff to wear surgical masks in the facility – with the aim to reduce transmission. In this situation and where a staff member has requested exemption, the reason should be considered – i.e. is there a skin allergy/pressure issue -trialling differing masks and brands, or using a barrier cream, taking breaks from consistent use – i.e. risk assess when the mask is worn. Where there may be respiratory issues/asthma, consider work placement in area where there is less risk (and no requirement to wear mask) to others and person exempting.
Note: If the risk assessment has been made that masks are required, the absence of masks poses risk to resident, others and self.
In the event that there is a suspected or known infection or facility outbreak of a respiratory (droplet/airborne) infection, we are guided by national, state/territory IPC guidelines to don surgical (droplet) or N95 (airborne) mask. The risk of transmission is higher in this scenario – then above. In this situation and where a staff member has requested exemption, and all avenues have been exhausted to find a suitable mask, consideration to a work location with less risk- i.e. another facility, work outdoors, work from home.
The absence of the mask poses risk to residents, others and self.
Regards Carrie